Each engagement below is presented the same way: the question I was asked, the constraints that shaped the work, what was built, and what has happened since. The case files are numbered so that they can be cited, and the numbering will not change.
Institutions built
Standing organizations and facilities that have outlived the engagements that created them.
CF-01
The IP Venture Clinic
Case Western Reserve University School of Law · 2014–2020 · Founding Managing Attorney
The question
Law schools teach intellectual property as doctrine and venture finance as theory. Could an accredited practicum put students to work on the real thing — forming ventures and cultivating intellectual property portfolios for clients whose interests carried genuine consequence?
The constraint
Accreditation requires supervised practice rather than simulation: live clients who could genuinely be harmed, students who rotate out every semester, and a single supervising attorney of record responsible for all of it.
What was built
An accredited student legal practicum focused on venture formation and intellectual property cultivation. I served as founding managing attorney and as attorney of record for the clinic's matters.
What happened
The clinic ran for six years. Its teaching model — law, management and science students working the same matter together — carried forward into the FUSION certificate program (CF-02) and into the pro bono structure behind Ohio Invents.
CF-02
FUSION
Case Western Reserve University · 2010–present · Co-founding faculty member and Director
The question
Commercialization tends to fail at the seams between disciplines: the scientist, the lawyer and the manager each hold a piece of the problem, and each is trained to read a different page. Could a graduate program put all three in one room, working on one technology, and evaluate them on the result?
The constraint
Three schools, with three calendars, three grading conventions and three faculty-approval processes — none of them with any particular incentive to cede control of curriculum.
What was built
An interdisciplinary graduate certificate program for law, management and doctoral science students, with coursework in commercialization and intellectual property management and in innovation and design.
What happened
FUSION is now in its sixteenth year. Of everything on this page it is the longest-lived, and the only one whose principal output is people rather than an organization.
CF-03
The Great Lakes Institute for Energy Innovation
Case School of Engineering · Strategic plan and launch
The question
Case had energy researchers distributed across engineering, the sciences and management — often competing with one another for the same federal solicitations. Could they be assembled into a single institute with the scale to be credible nationally?
The constraint
There was no new money to offer, and no authority over any of the faculty involved. The institute had to be worth joining on its own merits before it existed.
What was built
The initial strategic plan and launch of a research and development institute, bringing a full complement of engineering, scientific and management faculty to bear on the opportunity to grow a research capability of $50–100 million housed at Case Western Reserve University.
What happened
The institute launched and became the university's front door for energy research partnerships.
Ted has an unusual combination of credentials, experience and skills that makes him so very effective in supporting businesses to grow. He understands important details from both a business strategy and a legal point of view while bringing a broad world perspective to the possibilities and opportunities.
CF-04
The Cleveland Clinic Innovation Center
Cleveland Clinic Foundation · Chief Commercialization Counsel
The question
Cleveland Clinic Innovations was generating startups faster than it could house them. New ventures were being formed and then sent off campus to find space, losing daily contact with the clinicians whose work they were built upon. Where should a hospital's companies live?
The constraint
An existing building on an academic medical campus — with the regulatory, conflict-of-interest and facilities considerations that implies — and a requirement that the same facility house the CCF Innovations staff during its initial years.
What was built
A renovated and operationalized facility serving as both innovation center and accelerator for early-stage ventures, and as home to the CCF Innovations group through its formative years.
What happened
The startup program raised over $20 million in outside capital and created dozens of viable early-stage companies. Ventures structured during this period included Intelect Medical (a $3 million Series A in 2005; acquired by Boston Scientific in 2011 at a value of approximately $78 million), Cleveland BioLabs (seed funding through an early initial public offering in 2006, reaching a market capitalization above $100 million within two years), and PrognostiX (an initial $6 million investment and FDA approval of CardioMPO in May 2005; later reconceived as Cleveland HeartLab and acquired by Quest Diagnostics in 2017).
Ted is unmatched in creating new products and bringing them to market. His technical acumen is like none I've ever seen. His kindness and willingness to explain and listen to individuals at all levels sets him apart.
CF-05
The Tech Belt Energy Innovation Center — BRITE
Warren, Ohio · Structure, design and launch · now General Counsel and Chief Innovation Officer
The question
The region needed an energy technology accelerator, and its federal partners had projected a development cost well beyond what the region could raise. Could one be built anyway?
The constraint
The capital had to be assembled from sources that do not naturally combine — Department of Energy funding, state and federal Historic Tax Credits, philanthropy and corporate sponsorship — around a building worth preserving, in a community with little margin for error.
What was built
The organization itself: nonprofit formation and IRS documentation, board development and cultivation, publicly funded technology collaborations, a shared-resource technology center, and the Historic Tax Credit financing that built a Department of Energy technology accelerator in Warren, Ohio.
What happened
Planning and launch were completed for approximately $7 million — a fraction of the funding its federal partners had projected for a comparable facility. The center operates today as BRITE Energy Innovators, where I continue to serve as General Counsel and Chief Innovation Officer.
CF-06
The Beta Technology Park
Mayfield Village, Ohio · with Panzica Investments · President, first year of operations
The question
Could a suburb with an aging industrial base support a technology park that produced jobs in its first year, rather than waiting a decade on anchor-tenant economics?
The constraint
A public–private effort between Panzica Investments and the City of Mayfield Village, working in concert with sponsorships from National City Bank and the law firm of Thompson Hine, in flex space that had to carry itself from the first year of operations.
What was built
Flex and accelerator space with shared services and infrastructure; OneMayfield, a community-wide initiative delivering low-cost, point-to-multipoint wireless service to the business community; and a successful multi-phase application, for up to $1.2 million, designating Mayfield a Cuyahoga County Innovation Zone.
What happened
In the first twelve months of operations, more than thirty new, high-paying jobs were created across the Park's first five tenants — among them Quality Electrodynamics and Preemptive Solutions. I served as president of the Park during its first year.
CF-07
The Case Connection Zone
Case Western Reserve University · with the University's VP of Information Technology
The question
Gigabit fiber to the home existed as a technology demonstration. The more interesting question was what it was for — and whether a working neighborhood could answer it.
The constraint
A live residential neighborhood as the test environment, and university, industry and community partners who each needed something different from the same infrastructure.
What was built
A dedicated alpha-test environment over first-of-its-kind gigabit fiber to the home, with application suites in energy, health and wellness, education, and security.
What happened
The program helped accelerate early-stage energy management technologies and produced new industry-academic relationships — a working demonstration of what connected infrastructure can do for a community.
Regions convened
Engagements in which the deliverable was agreement — among institutions, funders and communities, none of which reported to me or to one another. This work continued until I joined Kohrman Jackson & Krantz in 2022, and I remain available for it.
CF-08
NorTech Energy Enterprise
Northern Ohio Technology Coalition · Advanced Energy Fellow
The question
Northern Ohio held substantial advanced energy assets — universities, national laboratories, utilities and manufacturers — and no mechanism for acting as a cluster. Could the region be brought together to fund a coordinated advanced energy development program?
The constraint
No party could direct any other. Funders, universities and companies each held an effective veto, and none held authority. The work was the patient development of community support, in every direction at once, with nothing to enforce it.
What was built
Community support and participation in an advanced energy cluster development program, with the Fund for Our Economic Future, the Cleveland Foundation and the region's scientific and technical institutions as key stakeholders.
What happened
A $2.6 million initial investment in the program.
Ted is one of those rare people that can not only mobilize in support of an agenda quickly but deepen and enrich virtually any context or deliverable with highly strategic thinking and a vast array of expertise. I've seen Ted navigate and inspire civic as well as commercial agendas with equal grace.
CF-09
Chardon Tomorrow
Chardon, Ohio · 2010–2016 · Founding Chairman
The question
A county-seat town with an intact historic square and a weakening commercial base. Could a Main Street program be established and governed locally — without becoming either a preservation society that blocks development, or a development body that erases the square?
The constraint
A volunteer board, a community in which every stakeholder knows every other, and the National Main Street framework's requirement that preservation and economic development advance together rather than trade against one another.
What was built
A Main Street program, structured and co-founded, for the historic preservation, revitalization and economic development of the local community.
What happened
I chaired the organization for its first six years and then handed it to local leadership.
CF-10
The Ohio Federal Research Network
State of Ohio · Air Force Research Laboratory (Wright-Patterson) and NASA Glenn
The question
Ohio is home to two major federal research institutions. Could university research be connected to them systematically — as a standing network — rather than one grant application at a time?
The constraint
Six centers of excellence across multiple universities, two federal laboratories with their own missions and procurement rules, and state funding contingent on demonstrated commercialization.
What was built
A framework for assessing and accelerating innovation, and for driving commercialization, across six centers of excellence — connecting university research to end users at the Air Force Research Laboratory and the NASA Glenn Research Center.
What happened
$20 million in state funding, with significant follow-on federal funding proposed against the framework.
CF-11
The OneCommunity Stimulus Desk
OneCommunity and regional stakeholders · American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
The question
Federal broadband funding under the Recovery Act moved quickly, and favored regions that could organize more quickly still. Could Northeast Ohio field credible applications in time?
The constraint
Federal deadlines measured in months, stakeholders who had not applied together before, and program rules still being written while the applications were due.
What was built
A working “Stimulus Office,” created with OneCommunity and regional stakeholders to design and build ARRA-funded broadband initiatives across the Ohio region — including the University Circle Innovation Zone that grew into the Case Connection Zone (CF-07).
What happened
An $18.7 million grant under the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program, assisting 25,000 low-income residents across seven communities in Ohio, Kentucky, Florida and Mississippi.
CF-12
The Knight Center for Digital Excellence
OneCommunity · the 26 Knight Foundation communities
The question
The Knight Foundation's twenty-six communities each sought digital transformation, and none wanted a template imposed from outside. What could travel between communities, and what had to remain local?
The constraint
One national program, twenty-six local value propositions, and a regional nonprofit broadband provider as the delivery vehicle for all of them.
What was built
A $26 million program in which information and communications technology serves as base infrastructure for local transformation — including a Digital Opportunities Challenge Grant through which each community develops its own value proposition.
What happened
The challenge grant structure preserved the program's design premise: shared infrastructure, locally defined value.
CF-13
The Global Technology Summits
With Team NEO and OneCommunity · Three summits
The question
Could Northeast Ohio attract technology companies by showing them the region at work, rather than pitching it to them?
The constraint
A business-community-led effort, undertaken with Team NEO and OneCommunity, with no incentive package to offer — only the region itself and vetted opportunities within it.
What was built
A summit series to identify, vet and bring synergistic technology companies into the region.
What happened
Over the course of three summits, more than twenty companies came to explore opportunities in fields ranging from broadband applications to high-speed communications to healthcare IT.
Called correctly
Assessments in which the recommendation was unwelcome at the time and borne out afterward — including those in which the answer was no.
CF-14
The Wright Fuel Cell Group
State of Ohio · Strategic analysis, ramp-up through wind-down
The question
A state-funded research and testing facility of more than $40 million, built to grow a fuel cell industry in Ohio, had a newly hired executive director and a mandate to produce a strategy. What should it do next?
The constraint
Substantial public money already committed; an industry developing more slowly than the original case had assumed; and stakeholders for whom continuation was the only welcome answer.
What was built
A strategic analysis of the statewide program — and the conclusion that the facility should not continue as a standalone entity.
What happened
The analysis became the foundation for transitioning the Group's activities into the Ohio Fuel Cell Coalition, preserving the capability without the standalone cost structure. The same analysis that justifies building a program is the analysis that tells you when it has run its course.
CF-15
Reserved
To be written — not yet published
This slot holds the second call in this band: an engagement in which the assessment concluded no, and the client did not proceed. Nothing in the source bios could fill it, because marketing bios do not record the projects that were stopped. Give me the engagement — anonymized to whatever degree you need — and I will write it in the same four-part form. Until then this band reads as one case file, and the band note above overstates what is on the page.
For your review — two editorial judgments were mineBand placement of the six added files. BRITE, the Beta Park and the Case Connection Zone sit under Institutions built; OFRN, the Stimulus Desk, Knight and the Summits under Regions convened. Several are arguable either way; move any of them and I will renumber before launch. The “question” and “constraint” entries throughout are reconstructions from the source bios, which record what was built and what resulted — not what was asked. Read those lines first.